Daya Dukung Perikanan Tangkap yang Berkelanjutan di Kutai Kartanegara: Pendekatan Jejak Kaki Ekologis

Authors

  • Heru Susilo Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/jppa.v1i2.182

Keywords:

Daya dukung, Jejak kaki ekologis, Kutai Kartanegara

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengestimasi daya dukung lingkungan sumberdaya kawasan Kabupaten Kutai kartanegara yang dapat dimanfaatkan bagi kegiatan perikanan yang berkelanjutan dengan pendekatan jejak kaki ekologis. Penelitian dilakukan pada Bulan Desember 2013 dan data yang dianalisis adalah data primer yang diperoleh di lapangan dan data sekunder yang berasal dari Laporan Statistik Perikanan Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Kutai kartanegara dan Propinsi Kalimantan Timur, studi literatur dan laporan-laporan penelitian yang relevan dengan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebutuhan ruang ekologis untuk aktivitas perikanan di Kutai kartanegara dipengaruhi oleh peningkatan produksi, keanekaragaman alat tangkap, fluktuasi jumlah nelayan dan peningkatan jumlah penduduk. Selain itu, terdapat ruang ekologis yang dapat dilakukan untuk kegiatan pemanfaatan perikanan dan merupakan indikator keberlanjutan bagi kegiatan perikanan di kawasan Kutai Kartanegara yang dapat ditunjukkan dengan rata-rata kebutuhan ruang sebesar 1,18 x 106 ha dengan pemanfaatan lahan perikanan/ecological footprint sebesar 0,0022 ha/kapita.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrianto, L. 2005. Valuation Resource Economics of Small Islands: A conception of ecological economics. Paper. Dissemination seminar of general guidelines for small islands. Mataram 2005.

Adrianto, L. 2006. Synopsis Economic Valuation of Natural Resources. Working Paper. Center for Coastal and Marine Resources Studies (CCMRS-IPB). Bogor.

Adrianto L, and Y. Matsuda 2004. Fishery Resources Appropriation in Yoron Island, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan: A Static and Dynamic Analysis. Kagoshima University. Japan.

Chambers, N., C. Simmons and M. Wackernagel, 2000. Sharing nature’s interest: ecological footprint as an indicator of sustainability. Earthscan Publicaton, London.

Djau, M. S. 2012. Analysis System of Fisheries Sustainability at The Regional Marine Protected Area (KKLD) Olele and Surrounding Waters, Bone Bolango regency of Gorontalo Province. Bogor Agricultural University. [Theses].

Ewing, B., S. Goldfinger, M. Wackernagel, M. Stechbart, S. M. Rizk, A. Reed, and Justin Kitzes, 2008. The Ecological Footprint ATLAS 2008. Global Footprint Network, Oakland.

Gulland, J.A., 1991. Fish Stock Assessment. A. Manual of Basic Methods. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester-New York-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapure Gulland, J.A., 1991. Fish Stock Assessment. A. Manual of Basic Methods. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester-New York-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapure.

Haberl, H., M. Wackernagel, F. Krausmann, Erb. K-H, C. Monfreda. 2004. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: a comparison. Land Use Policy 21:279–288

Kitzes, J., Wackernagel, M., Loh, J, Peller., A, Goldfinger, S., Cheng, Tea, K. 2007. Forthcoming. “Shrink and Share: Humanity’s Present and Future Ecological Footprint”. Accepted for special publication of the Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society.

Marine and Fisheries Agency Kutai Kartanegara. 2012. Fisheries Statistic Report Kutai Kartanegara 2011.

Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M. and Deumling, D. 2004. Establising national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments, Land Use Policy 21 (2004) 231-246.

Pauly. D and V. Christensen. 1995. Primary Production Recuired to Sustain Global Fisheries. Nature 374:255-257

Pereira, L.G and Ortega, E. 2012. A modified footprint method: The case study of Brazil. Ecological Indicators. Volume 16, May 2012, Pages 113–127

Sulistiawaty, D. 2011. Model of Tourism-Fisheries Integration on Batudaka Islands Tojo Una-Una Regency Central Sulawesi Province. Bogor Agricultural University. [Dissertation].

Wackernagel, M., Rees, W. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.

Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Bello, P., Linares, A.C., Falfan, L, Garcia, J.M., Suarez., G.A.I., Suarez, G.M.G. 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 29 (3/, 375-390.

Wada. Y. (1999). The myth of ’sustainable development’: the ecological footprint of Japanese consumption. The University of British Colombia [Theses].

Warren-Rhodes, K., and A. Koenig, 2001. Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implication for sustainable development. Ecological Economic 39: 347-359

Wilson. J., Anielski. M. 2005. Ecological Footprints of Canadian Municipalities and Regions. Prepared for: The Canadian Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Anielski Management Inc. www. anielski.com. 9847-90 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6E 2T2.

WWF, 2002. Living Planet report 2002. Global Footprint Network, Oakland. WWF, Gland, Switzerland

WWF, 2008. Guidebook to the national footprint accounts 2008. Global Footprint Network, Oakland.

Published

01-07-2014

How to Cite

Daya Dukung Perikanan Tangkap yang Berkelanjutan di Kutai Kartanegara: Pendekatan Jejak Kaki Ekologis. (2014). Jurnal Pembangunan Perikanan Dan Agribisnis, 1(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30872/jppa.v1i2.182

Similar Articles

1-10 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>