Socioeconomic Conditions And Survival Strategies Of Fish Porters At Selili Fish Landing Base, Samarinda

Authors

  • Andy Dimas Hermawan Universitas Mulawarman
  • Oon Darmansyah Universitas Mulawarman
  • Handayani Boa Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/tv488y61

Keywords:

Fish Porters, PPI Selili, Socioeconomic, Survival Strategies

Abstract

Fish porters at Selili Port (PPI) receive relatively low wages, barely enough to cover their living expenses. They face the risk of workplace accidents, cart breakdowns that hinder their work, and limited social connections, all of which impact the stability of their livelihoods. Active, passive, and networking strategies are essential to meeting their needs. The purposes of study are to understand the socioeconomic conditions, and to identify the survival strategies employed by fish porters at PPI Selili Samarinda. Data collection of research was conducted for 2 months in PPI Selili, Samarinda City. The sample consisted of 11 respondents using a purposive sampling method, considering their primary membership in the community and cooperative in communication. The results showed most fish porters at PPI Selili, Samarinda had low levels of education and low social connections, but their health was relatively guaranteed through BPJS membership. Economically, fish porters were included in the poor and lower-middle economic groups as measured by their residences, which were still in the form of rented houses and semi-permanent houses. The types of assets they owned with the highest value were only motorcycles and carts/pedicabs. The majority of income was IDR 3,000,000 per month. Four categories of survival strategies selected: 9.10% of fish porter workers implemented passive strategies, 36.36% implemented active and passive strategies combined, 36.36% implemented passive and network strategies combined. Meanwhile, 18.18% of fish porters implemented all three survival strategies. The government should be able to organize training/workshops to improve skills and labor protection policy.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boa, H., (2007). Perekonomian Wilayah Kota Samarinda Pada Sub Sektor Perikanan Tahun 1999-2007. Sumber, 5, 69.

BPS-KotaSamarinda, (2024). Upah Minimum Kota Samarinda (Umk) Dan Upah Minimum Provinsi Kalimantan Timur (Ump) 2024. https://samarindakota.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTMzIzI=/upah-minimum-kota-umk-di-kota-samarinda.html

BPS-KotaSamarinda, (2024). Kecamatan Samarinda Ilir Dalam Angka 2024 https://samarindakota.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/17064ff8abd390afe9e97023/kota-samarinda-dalam-angka-2024.html.html

BPS-Provinsi Kalimantan Timur, (2024). Persentase Penduduk Miskin September 2024 Turun Menjadi 5,51%. https://kaltim.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2025/01/15/1133/persentase-penduduk-miskin-september-2024-turun-menjadi-5-51-persen.html

Firdaus, M., dan R. Rahadian, (2015). Peran istri nelayan dalam meningkatkan pendapatan rumah tangga (Studi kasus di Desa Penjajab, Kecamatan Pemangkat, Kabupaten Sambas). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 10(2), 241-249.

Ginting, R. K., (2018). Strategi Bertahan Hidup Nelayan Tradisional Di Kampung Nelayan Seberang Kelurahan Belawan I Kecamatan Medan Belawan (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Medan Area).

Hanum, N., (2018). Pengaruh pendapatan, jumlah tanggungan keluarga dan pendidikan terhadap pola konsumsi rumah tangga

nelayan di Desa Seuneubok Rambong Aceh Timur. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomika, 2(1), 75-84.

Herdiani, I., A. Kurniawati., dan H. Nuradillah, (2021). Penyuluhan kesehatan rumah sehat pada masyarakat di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Cibeureum. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Progresif Humanis Brainstorming, 4(1), 47-52.

Illahi, F. M., dan A. Ariusni, (2020). Pengaruh fasilitas rumah terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai. Jurnal Kajian ekonomi dan Pembangunan. http://dx. doi. org/10.24036/jkep. v2i2, 12643.

Juniarti, A.Z., A. Wahab., dan M. Umar, (2020). Analisis Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Buruh Angkut Ikan Di Tpi Paotere Kota Makassar, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Skripsi, 9 – 24 Hal

Kogoya, W., (2021). Pengelolaan biaya rumah tangga bagi ketahanan ekonomi keluarga di masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 9(3), 68-89.

Miles, M. B., dan Huberman, A. M., (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Second Edition. 10-11, 337 page.

Pratomo, Y. dan I. I. I. F Maharika, (2020). Perencanaan Ruang Budaya Sungai Selili Di Samarinda Dengan Pendekatan Space Syntax Lokasi: Tempat Pelelangan Ikan Selili, Samarinda.

Risnawati, R., F. Z. Olilingo., B. R. Payu., dan I. Abdul, (2023). Determinan Kemiskinan Di Kabupaten Parigi Moutong. Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 1(2).

Siregar, N. A., N. R. Harahap., dan H. S. Harahap, (2023). Hubungan antara pretest dan postest dengan hasil belajar siswa kelas VII B di MTs Alwashliyah Pantai Cermin. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, 7(1), 1-13.

Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Strategi bertahan hidup petani padi gogo di Pulau Buru. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 3(1), 50-58.

Yusuf, I., (2019). Strategi bertahan hidup pedagang pasar sanggam adji dilayas kabupaten berau. EJournal Sosiatri-Sosiologi, 7(2), 195.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Socioeconomic Conditions And Survival Strategies Of Fish Porters At Selili Fish Landing Base, Samarinda. (2026). Jurnal Pembangunan Perikanan Dan Agribisnis, 13(2), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.30872/tv488y61

Similar Articles

11-20 of 151

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)